Suchergebnisse

This paper argues that the regional income gap of China is endogenously determined by its long-term economic development strategy. Development strategies can be broadly divided into two mutually exclusive groups: (i) the comparative advantage-defying (CAD) strategy, which attempts to encourage firms to deviate from the economy's existing comparative advantages in their entry into an industry or choice of technology; and (ii) the comparative advantage-following (CAF) strategy, which attempts to facilitate the firms' entry into an industry or choice of technology according to the economy's existing comparative advantages. Since the founding of the People's Republic of China, the government has pushed a CAD strategy, i.e., 'leap forward' strategy that emphasized the development of capitalintensive heavy industries. In most provinces, however, the priority industries under this strategy were inconsistent with the comparative advantage determined by the factor endowments in those provinces. Many enterprises in the priority industries were not viable in competitive markets and required interventions in the markets by the government to support and protect them. Consequently, the CAD strategy retarded the functions of market, impeded capital accumulation and hindered technology and productivity progress in the provinces. After the reform, the provinces in the central and western regions continue to follow the CAD strategy and have poor growth performance. Therefore, it is imperative to replace the CAD strategy with a CAF strategy and restructure the existing industries in each province according to the principle of comparative advantage. This latter strategy would lead to balanced development among regions and provinces.

This paper argues that both openness and poverty in a country are endogenously determined by the country's long-term economic development strategy. Development strategies can be broadly divided into two mutually exclusive groups: (i) the comparative advantage-defying (CAD) strategy, which attempts to encourage firms to deviate from the economy's existing comparative advantages in their entry into an industry or choice of technology; and (ii) the comparative advantage-following (CAF) strategy, which attempts to facilitate the firms' entry into an industry or choice of technology according to the economy's existing comparative advantages. To carry out a CAD strategy, many governments of LDCs subsidize the firms in priority sectors by distorting capital prices, foreign exchange, and other inputs; and use administrative methods to allocate price-distorted inputs to the firms. The functions of market will be suppressed. Rent-seeking will be widespread. As a result, economic performance will be poor and the income distribution issue will worsen. Foreign trade will also be retarded. Only if governments of less-developed countries make following their economy's comparative advantage the basic principle for promoting the economy's industrial development, will the economy have an open and well functioning market, maintain a high rate of capital accumulation, upgrade its endowment structure quickly, and see a more equitable distribution of income and fewer poor.